2015年10月gmat作文機經：Cookvile

　　Cookvile(考古)

　　>>> 本月原始

　　【1】

　　講一個工場在cookvile這個處所的工場是most advance and efficient, because they can produce ten drill bits per dollar,差未幾是這個意思，然後其余工場就只能produce seven drill bits per dollar。 然後他們就認為reduce cost is the only way to make more profits，意思也許是如許的 留意這裏的the only way 是進擊點。 末了他們有一個plan, shift the other machine to this factory, so they can attain a larger goal.

　　【2】

　　有個公司，它的工場裏只有Cookville factory可以臨盆10 drill bits per production cost, 其他的工場都無法跨越7 drill bits per production cost。然後誰人公司的manager說讓Cookville會合臨盆drill bit是公司到達larger profit goal的獨一辦法，以是他決議讓Cookville只臨盆drill bit，把臨盆其他器械的機械都移到其他工場去，這就能夠殺青larger goal了。

　　【3】

　　Cookville factor

　　【4】

　　一個factory臨盆drill 的效力高，以是想讓這個工場只臨盆drill， 把其他產物都shift到其余工場裏。

　　我的進擊點：

　　讓該factory臨盆大部門drill會發生運輸費，不克不及cover the savings

　　shift其他產物到其余工場會落空這個工場的地輿上風

　　進步efficiency增長revenue的辦法不止一個，另有進步治理職員程度、培訓員工等等辦法

　　>>> 考古

　　v2

　　坐穩：貌似是JJ裏沒有的。有個公司，它的工場裏只有Cookville factory可以臨盆10 drill bits per production cost, 其他的工場都無法跨越7 drill bits per production cost。然後誰人公司的manager說讓Cookville會合臨盆drill bit是公司到達larger profit goal的獨一辦法，以是他決議讓Cookville只臨盆drill bit，把臨盆其他器械的機械都移到其他工場去，這就能夠殺青larger goal了。

　　>>> 考古原題

　　The following appeared in a presentation by the chief production manager of a machine parts manufacturing company at a management meeting:

　　“Our factory in Cookville is our most advanced and efficient. It is capable of producing ten drill bits for each dollar of production costs, whereas none of our other factories can produce more than seven drill bits per dollar of production costs. Therefore, we can reduce our overall drill bit production costs by devoting the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production. Since reducing the production costs of individual machine parts is the only way to achieve our larger goal of reducing our overall production costs, dedicating the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production and shifting all other machine part production to our other factories will help us to attain that larger goal.”

　　Discuss how well reasoned . . .etc.

　　>>> 參考思緒

　　1. 計劃置疑:although C produce more bits per dollar, the reason may be that C has high- skilled workers, total new and high- quality machines, or less amounts of orders thus entirely shifting is fallacious, the results may be that the workers may be too tired and have too much burden, the machines would be worn out, and all this could contribute to the lowering of the productivity.

　　2. 充足需要前提:The only way to reduce costs is to reduce production costs: the management assumes without further more evidence that reducing the productions costs is the only way to enhance cost -effective production process: 可以 train workers , 引進 new technologies, 按期維修老舊裝備,進步 management strategy..

　　3. Gratuitous assumption:shifting the production of the other parts to other factories is

　　the appropriate way to go 大概轉移制作以後 cargo and transporting fees would roar

　　由於 sporadically 散布的工場可和時供貨,會合在一個處所無益於供貨,並且 shifting

　　牽涉 到遷居的用度,都是 huge expense, may not weigh over the elevation of the

　　productivity

　　4. Gratuitous assumption:Coikville factory entirely to drill bit production will reduce our

　　overall drill bit production cost. Perhaps, there are only one or several skilled workers who are can product them drill bits for each dollar of production cost. And they have

　　already reached their full potential.

　　5. 沒有斟酌 production process as a whole。舉例:大概臨盆進程和裝置進程要接洽很親密, 假如把其他關鍵放到其余 factory 會出題目