24. H小鎮吸引投資(考古)
>>> 本月原始
【1】
JJ裏有的，便是一個叫Helios的鎮子想吸引公司來這邊成長，提出了幾個論點：1.鎮子的賦閑率一貫很低。2.鎮子是industrial center。3.鎮子想轉型，成長高新科技(technology innovation)，以是頗有潛力。
【2】
作文也許意思是有一都會產業份額挺大，然後引進投資探求貿易機遇進步就業名額，但這座都會一向賦閑率都很低，還說想成長高新科技……
【3】
便是helios這個都會，假如新的企業擴大營業，可以重點斟酌這個都會。長處有：第一，賦閑率低，第二，汗青上的產業中間，能供給的啥記不清了好象是啥 就業機遇甚麽的，比別之處多。然後便是這個處所還做家當進級轉型，願望新企業吧研發能放過來。
我的進擊點時光幹系寫了兩個：
第一賦閑率低其實不代表這裏適 合新企業，由於企業對員工本質請求不同樣，高科技和勞動麋集型差異很大。
第二產業都會，許多配套舉措措施大概不合適許多高科技企業研發中間。
【4】
考的是一個city說，公司假如選取business應當選取它，由於這個city賦閑低blabla 。JJ有。
【5】
一個叫Helios的都會想要吸引公司來這裏成長，陳說了許多長處...
【6】
在Helios成長科技業的。
【7】
考了企業要探求new business opportunity 要去city of Helios那道
>>> 考古原題
The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regional life.
“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.”
>>> 參考思緒
1. 無依據假如：H是industrial center of the region不代表companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies will achieve in Helios.
2. 毛病比擬-時光縱向：毛病的假如曩昔的勝利可以或許代表將來。比喻說已飽和的資本、過火的競爭，和大概湧現的晦氣政策，均可能致使H地域的經濟再也不蓬勃。
3. 因果幹系：expand economic base也不克不及僅僅依附attract companies.
4. 由於H地域industrial and manufacturing比擬attractive，以是那邊的工人極可能只合適做這種的，假如缺少可以或許做innovative technologies and research的工人labor pool，那末極可能致使失敗。
5. H的低賦閑率更大概成為弊端，由於比若有less available work force，企業就必需進步wage能力吸引他們，從而進步了cost。
>>> 參考範文
In this argument corporations are urged to consider the city of Helios when seeking a new location or new business opportunities. To support this recommendation, the author points out that Helios is the industrial center of the region, providing most of the region’s manufacturing jobs and enjoying a lower-than-average unemployment rate. Moreover, it is argued, efforts are currently underway to expand the economic base of the city by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. This argument is problematic for two reasons.
To begin with, it is questionable whether the available labor pool in Helios could support all types of corporations. Given that Helios has attracted mainly industrial and manufacturing companies in the past, it is unlikely that the local pool of prospective employees would be suitable for corporations of other types. For example, the needs of research and development companies would not be met by a labor force trained in manufacturing skills. For this reason, it’s unlikely that Helios will be successful in its attempt to attract companies that focus or research and development of innovative technologies.
Another problem with the available work force is its size. Due to the lower than average unemployment rate in Helios, corporations that require large numbers of workers would not find Helios attractive. The fact that few persons are out of work suggests that new corporations will have to either attract new workers to Helios or pay the existing workers higher wages in order to lure them away from their current jobs. Neither of these alternatives seems enticing to companies seeking to relocate.
In conclusion, the author has not succeeded in providing compelling reasons for selecting Helios as the site for a company wishing to relocate. In fact, the reasons offered function better as reasons for not relocating to Helios. Nor has the author provided compelling reasons for companies seeking new business opportunities to choose Helios.
市場價：HK$ 92
