2015年10月gmat作文機經:公司搬家

2015/10/29 瀏覽次數:2 收藏
分享到:

  4.公司遷居

  原PO:Corporationsshould look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or anew location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate waslower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, andhistorically it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturingjobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base byattracting companies that focus on research and development of innovativetechnologies.

  考古:

  V1 corporations look to helios, helios有較低的賦閑率blabla,然後枚舉了helios的長處包含汗青悠長 技巧先輩甚麽甚麽的

  V2一個都會叫Heliod, 說是all businessshould go there for opportunities and open new plant如此,良久曩昔寫過,很好考到古估量。reason有:

  1. 是周邊都會中unimployment最低的,even in economic crisis

  2.has provided more manufacturing jobs than its proportion in the reagion in thepast

  3. 該市正在吸引high tech, innovation business

  V3 某地B 賦閑率一向比全部region低,然後historically has provided more thanits share of regional manufacturing jobs. In addition, B is attempting toexpand its economic base by attracting more 高科技立異公司。以是公司should look at B when 探求新貿易機遇大概選址 ---never267

  V4 一個regional life的magazine的article內裏有段話,說corporation都應當去Helios 這個都會找new business opportunity大概new location。由於以前recession的時刻Helios的unemployment rate was lower than regional average。且曩昔許多年Helios 都是industrial 中間。說如今Helios為了expand economy base要引進research and development new technology的公司。

  參考範文

  In this argumentcorporations are urged to consider the city of Helios when seeking a newlocation or new business opportunities. To support this recommendation, theauthor points out that Helios is the industrial center of the region, providingmost of the region’s manufacturingjobs and enjoying a lower-than-average unemployment rate. Moreover, it isargued, efforts are currently underway to expand the economic base of the cityby attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovativetechnologies. This argument is problematic for two reasons.

  To begin with,it is questionable whether the available labor pool in Helios could support alltypes of corporations. Given that Helios has attracted mainly industrial andmanufacturing companies in the past, it is unlikely that the local pool ofprospective employees would be suitable for corporations of other types. Forexample, the needs of research and development companies would not be met by alabor force trained in manufacturing skills. For this reason, it’s unlikely that Helios will be successful in itsattempt to attract companies that focus on research and development ofinnovative technologies.

  Another problemwith the available work force is its size. Due to the lower than averageunemployment rate in Helios, corporations that require large numbers of workerswould not find Helios attractive. The fact that few persons are out of worksuggests that new corporations will have to either attract new workers toHelios or pay the existing workers higher wages in order to lure them away fromtheir current jobs. Neither of these alternatives seems enticing to companiesseeking to relocate.

  In conclusion,the author has not succeeded in providing compelling reasons for selecting Heliosas the site for a company wishing to relocate. In fact, the reasons offeredfunction better as reasons for not relocating to Helios. Nor has the authorprovided compelling reasons for companies seeking new business opportunities tochoose Helios.