GRE寫作考試經典範文

　　小編本日為眾人整頓的是：GRE寫作測驗經範例文，願望對眾人有所贊助。更多有關GRE寫作的內容敬請存眷GRE測驗頻道。

　　A nationshould require all its students to study the same national curriculum until theyenter college ratherthan allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses tooffer.

　　The speaker would prefer a nationalcurriculum for all children up until college instead of allowing schools in different regionsthe freedom to decide on their own curricula. I agree insofar as some common core curriculumwould serve useful purposes for any nation. At the same time, however, individual statesand communities should have some freedom to augment any such curriculum as theysee fit; otherwise, a nation's educational system might defeat its own purposes in the long term.

　　A national core curriculum would bebeneficial to a nation in a number of respects. First of all,by providing all children withfundamental skills and knowledge, a common core curriculum would help ensure that our childrengrow up to become reasonably informed, productive members of society. In addition, acommon core curriculum would provide a predictable foundation upon which collegeadministrators and faculty could more easily build curricula and select course materials for freshmenthat are neither below nor above their level of educational experience. Finally, a core curriculumwould ensure that all school-children are taught core values upon which any democraticsociety depends to thrive, and even survive--values such as tolerance of others with differentviewpoints, and respect for others.

　　However, a common curriculum that isalso an exclusive one would pose certain problems,which might outweigh the benefits,noted above. First of all, on what basis would certain course work be included or excluded,and who would be the final decision- maker? In all likelihood these decisions would be inthe hands of federal legislators and regulators, who are likely to have their own quirkynotions of what should and should not be taught to children--notions that may or may notreflect those of most communities, schools, or parents.

　　Besides, government officials arenotoriously susceptible to influence-peddling by lobbyists who do not have the best interests ofsociety's children in mind.

　　Secondly, an official, federallysanctioned curriculum would facilitate the dissemination of propaganda and other dogma whichbecause of its biased and one-sided nature undermines the very purpose of true education: toenlighten. I can easily foresee the banning of certain text books, programs, and websites whichprovide information and perspectives that the government might wish to suppress--assome sort of threat to its authority and power.

　　Although this scenario might seemfar-fetched, these sorts of concerns are being raised already at the state level.

　　Thirdly, the inflexible nature of auniform national curriculum would preclude the inclusion of programs, courses, and materials that areprimarily of regional or local significance. For example, California requires childrenat certain grade levels to learn about the history of particular ethnic groups who make upthe state's diverse population. A national curriculum might not allow for this feature, andCalifornia's youngsters would be worse off as a result of their ignorance about the traditions,values, and cultural contributions of all the people whose citizenship they share.

　　Finally, it seems to me that imposinga uniform national curriculum would serve to undermine the authority of parentsover their own children, to even a greater extent than uniform state laws currently do.Admittedly, laws requiring parents to ensure that their children receive an education that meetscertain minimum standards are well-justified, for the reasons mentioned earlier. However, when suchstandards are imposed by the state rather than at the community level parents are left withfar less power to participate meaningfully in the decision-making process. This problemwould only be exacerbated were these decisions left exclusively to federal regulators.

　　In the final analysis, homogenizationof elementary and secondary education would amount to a double-edged sword. While itwould serve as an insurance policy against a future populated with illiterates andignoramuses, at the same time it might serve to obliterate cultural diversity and tradition. The optimalfederal approach, in my view, is a balanced one that imposes a basic curriculum yet leavesthe rest up to each state--or better yet, to each community.

　　以上便是本日小編為眾人分享的GRE寫作測驗經範例文，願望對加入GRE測驗的考生有所贊助。想要加入GRE培訓、雅思培訓的考生請選取。末了，小編祝眾人出國留學之路順順遂利!更多出色內容盡在留學GRE測驗頻道。