GRE Issue寫作思路邏輯鏈條舉例

　　本日小編和眾人分享GRE寫作備考的相幹內容。好比，如安在GRE Issue中舉行段落睜開，你還在用家長裏短舉例子嗎?滿滿的幹貨，願望對眾人備考GRE寫作有所贊助。

　　本文重點講的是Issue的寫法，造就辯證思慮的邏輯。它問你是不是贊成一個概念。你須要註解本身的立場：批評性思慮，不必定是絕對的對錯，要從兩個或多個方面來斟酌。

　　例題講授

　　82.Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.

　　托福測驗中不在意邏輯：用交同夥、新文化+說話進修，再來一個妥協就能夠。

　　然則從GRE的角度，上面的邏輯就有題目。去外洋進修可以交同夥，那末是說在海內進修就交不到同夥嗎?出國可以進修說話和文化，那末在海內就進修不到說話和文化嗎?另有許多同窗愛好寫妥協，但這裏是有誤區的。我以為妥協段落是可以寫的，然則在論證過程當中並無甚麽養分，只是湊字數，完成一篇文章罷了。

　　你以前認為的妥協段落是如許的：

　　發問：你認為要不要爬珠穆朗瑪峰啊?

　　答：要!

　　來由一：錘煉身材(嗯，是的，挺好的。)

　　來由二：可以贊助我更好地交同夥(行吧，大概對你來講只有在戶外的時刻能力交到一些特殊好的驢友。)

　　妥協：我認可爬珠穆朗瑪峰有很大的危害，大概會是以損失性命，就算沒有喪命，但也大概是以落下病根。(妥協)然則對付前面所說的兩個利益來講，我認為爬珠穆朗瑪峰仍然值得。(誰信啊?)

　　用上面這個思緒去寫Issue，應當不會拿到太好的分數。說回適才的標題，咱們可以如許寫。

　　起首有一個introduction，“我的概念是……”

　　INTRO：

　　It is argued in the statement that … ，有必定的benefits，but not a requirement!

　　Study overseas

　　1.personal development: academically vs professionally: 1. different countries = different cultures = Disparity in education concepts and systems = disparity in academic researches = students with new perspective + innovative know-how / knowledge; 2 professionally:global citizen = working & researching cooperate with people different cultural background = team work = cultural tolerance = immersion in the country = one good way = one semester in foreign countries.

　　NOT study overseas

　　1.problems = exposed to a new cultural / social environment: cultural tolerance vs cultural shock: on the one hand, culture shock frustrates students = not focusing too much on the studying but struggling with the cultural issues every day = loss of orientation; on the other hand, exposure to so many new interesting and exotic events, not focusing on studying but going for fun for most of the time, even try drugs / violence and other things they might not think of in homeland.

　　2.University should require??? free will vs obligation = require = ignorance of the personal willingness = might not be interested = waste of time and effort, especially great financial burden for either the university or the students. IF Universities sponsor the oversea studies =students not getting the expected result = waste of limited resources; IF students self finance = expensive + the results not ensured. SO University create the system to ensure the possibility, provide relevant offerings but not set a requirement for the the students = unfair.

　　每一個部門都有一個邏輯鏈條。

　　以上便是本日小編為眾人分享的GRE Issue寫作思緒邏輯鏈條舉例，願望對加入GRE測驗的考生有所贊助。想要懂得2016gre測驗時光、gre測驗流程、gre測驗內容、gre機經等信息和想要加入gre英語培訓考生請選取留學。末了，小編祝眾人出國留學之路順順遂利!更多出色內容盡在留學GRE測驗頻道。