GRE Issue寫作思路邏輯鏈條舉例

2016/07/08 瀏覽次數:16 收藏
分享到:

  本日小編和眾人分享GRE寫作備考的相幹內容。好比,如安在GRE Issue中舉行段落睜開,你還在用家長裏短舉例子嗎?滿滿的幹貨,願望對眾人備考GRE寫作有所贊助。

  本文重點講的是Issue的寫法,造就辯證思慮的邏輯。它問你是不是贊成一個概念。你須要註解本身的立場:批評性思慮,不必定是絕對的對錯,要從兩個或多個方面來斟酌。

  例題講授

  82.Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.

  托福測驗中不在意邏輯:用交同夥、新文化+說話進修,再來一個妥協就能夠。

  然則從GRE的角度,上面的邏輯就有題目。去外洋進修可以交同夥,那末是說在海內進修就交不到同夥嗎?出國可以進修說話和文化,那末在海內就進修不到說話和文化嗎?另有許多同窗愛好寫妥協,但這裏是有誤區的。我以為妥協段落是可以寫的,然則在論證過程當中並無甚麽養分,只是湊字數,完成一篇文章罷了。

  你以前認為的妥協段落是如許的:

  發問:你認為要不要爬珠穆朗瑪峰啊?

  答:要!

  來由一:錘煉身材(嗯,是的,挺好的。)

  來由二:可以贊助我更好地交同夥(行吧,大概對你來講只有在戶外的時刻能力交到一些特殊好的驢友。)

  妥協:我認可爬珠穆朗瑪峰有很大的危害,大概會是以損失性命,就算沒有喪命,但也大概是以落下病根。(妥協)然則對付前面所說的兩個利益來講,我認為爬珠穆朗瑪峰仍然值得。(誰信啊?)

  用上面這個思緒去寫Issue,應當不會拿到太好的分數。說回適才的標題,咱們可以如許寫。

  起首有一個introduction,“我的概念是……”

  INTRO:

  It is argued in the statement that … ,有必定的benefits,but not a requirement!

  Study overseas

  1.personal development: academically vs professionally: 1. different countries = different cultures = Disparity in education concepts and systems = disparity in academic researches = students with new perspective + innovative know-how / knowledge; 2 professionally:global citizen = working & researching cooperate with people different cultural background = team work = cultural tolerance = immersion in the country = one good way = one semester in foreign countries.

  NOT study overseas

  1.problems = exposed to a new cultural / social environment: cultural tolerance vs cultural shock: on the one hand, culture shock frustrates students = not focusing too much on the studying but struggling with the cultural issues every day = loss of orientation; on the other hand, exposure to so many new interesting and exotic events, not focusing on studying but going for fun for most of the time, even try drugs / violence and other things they might not think of in homeland.

  2.University should require??? free will vs obligation = require = ignorance of the personal willingness = might not be interested = waste of time and effort, especially great financial burden for either the university or the students. IF Universities sponsor the oversea studies =students not getting the expected result = waste of limited resources; IF students self finance = expensive + the results not ensured. SO University create the system to ensure the possibility, provide relevant offerings but not set a requirement for the the students = unfair.

  每一個部門都有一個邏輯鏈條。

  以上便是本日小編為眾人分享的GRE Issue寫作思緒邏輯鏈條舉例,願望對加入GRE測驗的考生有所贊助。想要懂得2016gre測驗時光、gre測驗流程、gre測驗內容、gre機經等信息和想要加入gre英語培訓考生請選取留學。末了,小編祝眾人出國留學之路順順遂利!更多出色內容盡在留學GRE測驗頻道。

掃描二維碼,更多gre備考材料一手控制!

  佳構推舉:

  私塾-全體英語課程系列

  高分案例集錦 GRE提分的不貳之選

  一對一說話培訓佳構課程!

  在線直播小班課程!

  測驗公然課 百種免費課程會聚一堂!

  整日制高端學堂開課啦!