在備戰ACT瀏覽測驗的過程當中，懂得一些關於瀏覽的知識性常識無可厚非。是以，在接下來的文章中，小編就為正在備戰ACT測驗的同夥們，就三大ACT瀏覽題型：直接究竟題、舉例感化題、推論題一一舉行先容，願望可以給眾人帶來必定的贊助!
ACT瀏覽測驗的有三類題型，即直接究竟題、舉例感化題、推論題。本文，留學小編就為同窗們就這三大ACT瀏覽題型舉行先容，願望可以給正在備考ACT測驗的小火伴兒帶來贊助!
直接究竟題：
此類標題通常為就文中所供給的信息舉行直接發問，須要考生找到準確的對應處，並作同義轉換。
原文： “The revisionist interpretation, which I support, does not enshrinedinosaurs as paragons of intellect, but it does maintain that they were notsmall brained after all. They had the “right-sized” brains for reptiles of their body size.”
譯文：我所支撐的修改主義者的說明，便是不把恐龍視為智力的榜樣，然則也主意他們究竟不是小腦。對他們這類體態的爬蟲類來講，他們的腦的巨細恰好適合。
標題：According to the passage, what is the revisionist interpretationconcerning the relationship between intelligence and physical size?
A.Dinosaurs ACTually had relatively large brains.
B.Dinosaurs were paragons of intellect.
C.Dinosaurs were relatively small brained.
D.Dinosaurs’ brains were appropriatelysized.
舉例感化題：
此類標題就文中的例子舉行發問，須要考生答復此例子在文中所起的感化。
原文： “Government is so technical that even career civil servants cannotexplain what is happening. In 1978 I attended a seminar on federal estate andgift tax, where the Internal Revenue Service lawyers responsible for this areafrankly confessed that they did not understand the Tax Reform ACT of 1976.”
譯文：當局是如斯的有技巧含量以致於乃至連公事員都不克不及說明正在產生著甚麽。1978年，我出席了一個聯邦資產稅收的研究會，在這裏賣力的美國海內稅局的狀師坦率地認可到，他們不明確1976年的稅收改造法案。
標題：The author uses the description of the tax seminar in 1978 to makethe point that some governmental issues are:
A. sotechnical that not even career civil servants can understand them.
B. sotechnical that only career civil servants can understand them.
C. moretechnical than they used to be before the passage of the Tax Reform ACT.
D. tootechnical for anyone other than an Internal Revenue Service tax lawyer tounderstand.
推論題：
此類標題與直接究竟題分歧，不是就文中的信息舉行直接的發問，而是考核作者所寫的某處內容現實表示了甚麽。
原文：“The remarkable thing about dinosaurs is not that they becameextinct, but that they dominated the earth for so long…”
“People, on this criterion, are scarcely worth mentioning—5 million years perhaps since Australopithecus, a mere 50, 000 forour own species, Homo sapiens…”
譯文：恐龍最有名的一件工作不是他們滅盡了，而是他們占領了地球如斯之長的時光。
人類，在這類尺度下，基本不值得一提——也許5百萬年前的南邊古猿，僅僅5萬年前的咱們本身的物種，智人。
標題：In the context of the passage, what does the author mean when hestates that “people … arescarcely worth mentioning” (lines 81-82)?
A.Compared to the complex social behavior of dinosaurs, human behavior seemssimple.
B.Compared to the longevity of dinosaurs, humans have been on earth a very shorttime.
C.Compared to the size of dinosaurs, human seem incredibly small.
D.Compared to the amount of study done on dinosaurs, study of human behavior isseverely lacking
在本日的文章中，小編重要為備戰ACT瀏覽的同窗們，就ACT瀏覽題型的信息舉行了一個較為具體的先容，還請眾人可以或許留意!想要懂得更多關於ACT測驗的常識嗎?還請持續存眷網相幹頻道！
掃描二維碼，更多act備考材料一手控制!
佳構推舉：
2016寒假班熱報中 現報名送5000元！
一對一說話培訓佳構課程！
整日制高端學堂開課啦！
市場價：HK$ 110
