2015年6月SAT真題答案之寫作範文及點評

2015/09/08 瀏覽次數:7 收藏
分享到:

  本日網sat測驗頻道小編給考生們匯集整頓了2015年6月美國西部sat真題謎底的寫作部門,願望眾人能從sat真題謎底中進修到sat寫作辦法。如下是具體內容,僅供參考。

  寫作標題

  Is it possible to remain conflicting loyalties?

  此次北美的第二個作文題是關於loyalty 的,曩昔曾湧現過一次相似的癥結詞,即2008年3月的標題:Should people always be loyal?

  sat真題謎底——收集範文整頓

  It is not possible to maintain conflicting loyalties. A person’s loyalty is the strong sense of attachment and devotion to a group or a person. It is often based on some fundamental values that an individual holds dearly. Conflicts will result when values cannot be held simultaneously. Under such circumstances, people will be forced to make choices in order to be true to the one that really matters. This concept can be illustrated by the experience of many historical figures, among which Cesar Chavez and Oskar Schindler are two representative ones.

  Cesar Chavez was one of the most influential American farmer union leaders in the 20th Century. He had to make a choice between his family and his career. In the Early 20th century, migrant farm workers, especially those from Latin American countries, enjoyed little social and political rights. Because of this lack of protection, they were heavily exploited by the farm owners. As a member of the ethnical group, Chavez felt strong responsibility to help his people to gain more rights. He knew this could only be achieved by founding a farm workers’ union and leading the workers to fight through large scale campaigns. However, such a plan would require him to give up his well-paid job and work for almost nothing for the rest of his life. This put Chavez in dilemma, as apart from being a loyal member of his ethnic group he was also a devoted father to his eight children. Leaving his job meant the whole family would have to rely on his wife alone to make money, and all his wife could do was to work in the farms in extremely poor condition for meager wages. Nonetheless, Chavez eventually made the painful decision of working for the greater good, and sacrificed his family’s financial stability. After decades’ hard working, Chavez helped tens of thousands of farm workers gain higher pay, medical care, retirement benefits and better working and living conditions. Although he would have loved being loyal to both his family and his people, Cesar Chavez chose to sacrifice his own family’s interest to help his people. It was a choice that could not be avoided.

  Another good example to illustrate the concept that it is often impossible to maintain conflicting loyalties is shown in the change in Oskar Schindler. Schindler was a business man, who made a great fortune by selling military supplies to the Nazis. At first, because of the financial benefit, Swindler was very loyal to the Germans and would do anything they asked of him. However, as the Nazis became more and more obvious with their intention of racial cleansing, Schindler started to sympathize with the Jewish people. It became impossible for him to be loyal to both parties. He eventually betrayed the Germans by tricking them into believing that he needed cheap labors to manufacture machine parts for the German army. Whereas, in fact, he just protected those Jewish workers inside his tall walls, until the end of WWII. His list of Jews was later know as Schindler’s list and it became the testimony of humanity and human conscience. When the value of financial gain was in conflict with his conscience, and Schindler had to choose from being loyal to the Nazis or the Jewish people, he chose the latter without hesitation. It would not have been possible for him to remain loyal to both.

  Although people would prefer to be loyal to others as long as possible, sometimes they could not maintain them all. In such case, they will have to choose the one that meant the most to them just like Cesar Chavez and Oskar Schindler have done.

  【點評】

  假如僅僅是人們是不是該loyal 實際上是很好寫的。由於人們可以對本身的構造,對某小我,乃至是對某個目的忠實,那末咱們可以用的例子就許多,好比鍥而不舍類的(對目的忠實),自我就義的(對本身地點的團體忠實)等等。然則此次的標題卻在本來題目標基本上增長了難度,在忠實前面加之了一個潤飾,conflicting。這仿佛使得咱們可以或許應用的例子規模縮小了許多。然則假如咱們可以或許想到人們經常要做出選取,而這些選取的根據實在便是對分歧的事物的忠實的棄取。那末這道題就變得很簡略了。只要選取那些觸及到決定的例子,並點出例子中分歧的選取對應的是對誰或是對甚麽的忠實便可。

  以上就是2015年6月SAT真題謎底之寫作部門的範文及剖析,願望考生們能進修個中的精髓語句寫法,經由過程對真題範文的進修和鑒戒慢慢進步sat寫作程度。