官方發布的act寫作範文

2015/11/05 瀏覽次數:12 收藏
分享到:

  官方給出了一篇題目為“Intelligent Machines”的act寫作範文,列出了6篇範文,分數從1-6分不等。咱們賣力瀏覽下面的滿分act寫作範文,可以發明新的ACT寫作,仍然有章可循。

  題目是針對intelligent machines替換人工的征象睜開評論辯論,並一共如下三個看法:

  Perspective 1: What we lose with the replacement of people by machines is some part of our own humanity. Even our mundane daily encounters no longer require from us basic courtesy, respect, and tolerance for other people.

  Perspective 2: Machines are good at low-skills, repetitive jobs, and at high-speed, extremely precise jobs. In both cases they work better than humans. This efficiency leads to a more prosperous and progressive world for everyone.

  Perspective 3: Intelligent machines challenge our long-standing ideas about what humans are or can be. This is good because it pushes both humans and machines toward new, unimagined possibilities.

  滿分作文:

  As technology improves, and more and more tasks are completed by machines instead of humans, the question is no longer about what we can do with machines, but rather what we should. Although the usage of machines increases efficiency and our standard of living, it detracts from the value of human life.

  As machines increasingly perform all our basic tasks, society is able to produce more. The additional production adds material value to our society and frees people up from these low-skill tasks. This is in agreement with Perspective Two which claims that this industrialization leads to more prosperity. For example, in the 18th century, short-staple cotton that was grown in the Southern United States required an immense amount of labor in order to seperate the seeds from the fiber to process the cotton to make it marketable.

  However, in the mid-19th century, Eli Whitney, an American entrepreneur, invented the cotton gin, which allowed for automation of cotton processing. This machine replaced the need of a large work force for the process and greatly improved production. As a result of the cotton gin, short-staple cotton production skyrocketed, increasing by more than 10 times in the South while bringing prosperity to the region and setting in motion a new industrial era in America. This is in agreement with Perspective Three, which says that mechanization allows for “unimagined possibilities”. Although there are clearly many advantages to industrialization, there are also some heavy drawbacks.

  The replacement of humans by machines leads to the loss of value to human life, an effect that outweighs the material gains of automation. The search to find human tasks that can be performed by machines inevitably leads to comparisons between the human and the machine. If a company executive wants to see if a inventory management team can be replaced by a robotic system, he will compare the two and determine which can do a better job. When this occurs, the people on the team are evaluated not for their worth as human beings, but for their effectiveness at performing a specific function—in essence, as we would

  evaluate a machine. In a larger sense, when we begin to think about humans in this way, the worth of a person’s life becomes dependent on only what they can do and no longer has any intrinsic value. As Perspective One states, we begin to lose our humanity. This new mindset and way of evaluating people, though seemingly harmless in the workplace, is devastating when it begins to pervade a society. If a person is judged only on his or her capability, there is no reason for a person to remain after they have served their function. This would warrant

  genocide against the elderly and the disabled because their burden on society would not be made up for by any production. Although the machines may seem to only fulfill the low skill jobs at the moment, there is no barrier to prevent the machines from replacing more. As the machines increase in intelligence, they will replace any tasks done by humans and render us unnecessary and worthless.

  Due to the risks of dehumanization, the material benefits of machines are not enough to justify its increasing presence.

  面臨新的ACT作文改造,咱們沒必要驚恐,詳細可以從如下幾個方面舉行備考溫習:

  1. 造就邏輯練習才能:由於新的ACT寫作已將咱們要寫的概念給出了,咱們須要做的便是若何來有邏輯地舉行論證。是以,咱們須要多瀏覽一些群情性子的文章,並留意視察群情思緒的睜開。

  2. 積聚例子:從滿分範文不丟臉出,例子是評分尺度中主要的一環,這個例子只管即便不要太生存化(與托福作文區離開來),然則與SAT寫作的例子比擬又靈巧接地氣一些。

  3. 演習:今朝官方出來的標題相稱有限,然則咱們可以采取舊ACT真題的寫作標題舉行演習,並讓先生修正找出作文中的邏輯不周密和語法欠妥之處舉行修正。

  以上內容為考生分享了官方宣布的act寫作範文,願望能為考生的act寫作供給一些參考,對付滿分act寫作範文考生可以參考其文章構造和用詞,以便將這些優良的得分點更好的鑒戒,預祝考生在接下來的ACT測驗中有精彩的施展。