奧巴馬稱不會改變打擊ISIS戰略

2015/11/27 瀏覽次數:8 收藏
分享到:

  11月27日CNN聽力:奧巴馬稱不會轉變襲擊ISIS計謀 美國農場動物濫用抗生素激發爭議

 

  Welcome,viewers worldwide,to CNN STUDENTSNEWS.

  I'm Carl Azuz.

  We're starting in the nation of Turkey,where theleaders of 20 countries have gathered for the annualG20 Summit.

  Usually,it focuses on global economic growth,butthe recent terrorist attacks in Paris,France,are dominating the discussions at the G20.

  U.S. President Barack Obama held a conference yesterday.

  He spent a good part of it defending U.S. strategy for fighting ISIS,as criticism increases thatAmerican isn't doing enough to defeat the terrorist group.

  There have been a few who suggested that we should put large numbers of U.S. troops on theground.

  It is not just my view but the view of closest military and civilian advisers that that would be amistake.

  The president plans to keep the current U.S. strategy in place which partly involves airstrikeson ISIS targets and helping local groups fight ISIS.

  The Obama administration also says it's sticking with plans to accept 10,000 Syrian refugeesin the U.S. next year.

  Yesterday,at least 19 U.S. states announced they were against allowing Syrian refugees toresettle there.

  Eighteen of them are led by Republican governors,one is by a Democrat.

  And at least five states said they'd accept refugees,all of them led by Democrat governors.

  Part of the reason for the controversy is that French authorities reported at least one of theParis attackers had entered France with the flood of refugees from Syria.

  And six of the terrorists have reportedly spent time in Syria.

  The U.S. State Department says it has a process that allows for the safe resettlement of Syrianrefugees.

  The director of the Central Intelligence Agency says the Paris attacks probably weren't a one-off event.

  So,securities are being increased across Europe.

  French President Francois Hollande announced 5,000 positions would be added to hiscountry's paramilitary police force.

  Seven attackers were killed in the Paris assault,

  but the Islamic terrorist group ISIS,which claimed responsibility,says eight attackers wereinvolved.

  So,the search for suspects continues.

  The U.S. and France say they are increasing the ways they share intelligence.

  When we're talking about terror investigations that cross across 50 states,hundreds ofthousands of investigations simultaneously,you can't go in to a single investigation as a one-off every time.

  It's not a new process every time you open a case.

  There are simple ways to consider how to break down a case.

  So,let's go through six or eight of them.

  You want to talk about money,where the money for the group is coming from.

  You want to talk about travel,whether the individuals in the group have gone some place toreceive training.

  You want to know who the conspirators are.

  You want to know who's at the core of the spider web of conspiracy.

  You want to know what we call facilitators,who,for example,provided documentation,whoprovided assistance to travel overseas.

  You want to know about documents,passports,driving license.

  You want to know the critical question: do they have access to weapons and explosives?

  When you're looking at a case like this,you have to understand these initially to break downthe case to determine its complexity.

  Among all these,there are two or three that I would focus on to insure that you own the case.

  The first and most significant,do I have one spider in the spider web or 10?

  Second thing you want to focus,do these guys have the capability to do something tonight inAmerica that threatens a woman,or child,or a family?

  Last and most interesting: travel.

  In my experiences,as soon as you travel to a place likeYemen,Somalia,Pakistan,Afghanistan,Syria and Iraq,they think in a fundamentally moresophisticated way than somebody who has not had access to overseas training.

  So,you walk in the room in the morning,7:00 tomorrow morning,don't say,hey,we got anotherterror threat in New York,or Chicago or Los Angeles.

  Say,hey,we got another case,there's a way to break down this case so not everyone is new,andthere are some things we want to prioritize to ensure that every time,we can take it down cleanand neat.

  Thank you.

  The American Academy of Pediatrics says the use of antibiotics in farm animals is threateningthe children who eat meat.

  How? Well,antibiotics are used to kill infections.

  But there's been an increase in people's resistance to certain antibiotics,meaning the drugsaren't as effective as they used to be.

  Health officials say part of the reason for this is that doctors sometimes prescribed antibioticswhen they're not necessary.

  The Pediatrics Organization,which focuses on children's health,says another reason forresistance is because antibiotics are overused in farm animals,so they're encouraging parentsto buy meat that has been raised without antibiotics.

  Why do some farmers use them?

  For one thing,they help keep the animals healthy and they help them gain weight,which makesthe animals more profitable for farmers.

  Western France is where we begin today's "Roll Call".

  A warm welcome to our viewers in Chateaux Lague.

  We're glad to be part of your day at University Institute of Technology.

  The western U.S. is up next.

  In the city of Bend,Oregon,don't tread on the Diamondbacks of High Desert Middle School.

  And,finally,to West Virginia.

  Hello to everyone at Musselman High School in the community of Inwood.

  點擊下一頁檢察譯文