聯合國大會外交派對 各國首腦關註焦點問題

2015/09/30 瀏覽次數:36 收藏
分享到:

  9月30日CNN聽力:結合國大會交際派對 列國領袖存眷核心題目


  First up today on CNN STUDENT NEWS-spotlightingthe United Nations General Assembly.

  It's the 70th session of the internationalorganization of 193 countries.

  Yesterday, there were five world leaders we told youwe were keeping an eye on.

  U.S. President Barack Obama focused part of hisspeech on climate change and part on Syria's civil war.

  He called Syrian President Bashar al Assad a tyrant who kills innocent children.

  Russian President Vladimir Putin speech came later.

  He also addressed Syria, but said its government was fighting terrorism and that notcooperating with Syria's leadership would be a mistake.

  Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed the environment, saying China would do its part toreduce pollution.

  And Cuban President Raul Castro in his first ever speech at the U.N. acknowledged diplomaticrelations have been reestablished between the U.S. and Cuba,but said the U.S. would have tolift its economic embargo and do a lot more before things could be normal between the twocountries.

  Iranian President Hassan Rouhani addressed the controversial nuclear deal involving hiscountry and six other nations lead by the U.S.

  He said the deal should contribute to sustainable peace and stability in the Middle East andthat the U.S. was, quote, "forced to set aside pressure and sanctions and chose discussionsinstead."

  U.S.congressional efforts to reject the deal stalled weeks ago in the Senate, which means theObama administration's deal with Iran will go through.

  But what about the next U.S. administration?

  So, the Iranian deal is more than 50 pages long.

  It's got a lot of documents, annexes, supplements.

  It's, you know, really easy to boil it down to a few sound bytes or a few bullet points.

  But it's a very technical and complex agreement.

  President Obama has moved ahead with the deal, despite intense criticism from Republicansand the fact that the majority of Americans are against it.

  This is a bad deal with decades long consequences.

  This deal is not just important to the United States or to international security.

  It's very important to Israel's security.

  Israel sees an Iranian nuclear weapon as a threat to its existence and wants to stop that at allcosts.

  Not surprisingly, there are a lot of differing views on how the 2016 candidates would treat theIran deal.

  If I'm president, that deal won't survive.

  Rip to shreds this catastrophic deal.

  Never, ever, ever in my life have I seen any transaction so incompetently negotiated.

  The problem here is five other countries negotiated this deal with Iran for the past two years,along with the United States, and it was endorsed by the U.N. Security Council.

  U.S. credibility is on the line.

  Is it perfect? Well, of course, not.

  But is it a strong agreement? Yes, it is.

  And because we've proven our commitment to diplomacy first, the world will more likely joinus.

  As I believe that this approach is the best way forward.

  點擊下一頁檢察譯文