《老炮兒》片方回應吸煙鏡頭多:電影還原市井生活

2016/01/07 瀏覽次數:5 收藏
分享到:

  1月7日口譯文章:《老炮兒》片方回應抽煙鏡頭多:片子還原街市商人生存

  比來異常火爆的片子《老炮兒》的制片人,在周六回應了北京控煙協會控告片子湧現過量抽煙鏡頭的題目。制片方表現,片子只是在真實反應在拍攝的誰人時代本地人的生存。

  木曜日,在一封致全球時報的公然信中,該協會嚴格批駁了片子《老炮兒》裏湧現了過量的抽煙鏡頭。由於該協會以為這些鏡頭疏忽了北京禁煙令對在大眾室內場所、事情區和大眾交通裏的禁煙劃定。

  在信中寫道,“在一部138分鐘的片子裏充滿著描寫焚燒,遞煙和抽煙的鏡頭。似乎整部片子裏每小我都在抽煙,這與實際不符也沒有需要。他們在大眾場所吸煙是不品德且違法的。”

  該協會請求片子制片偏向北京市民報歉,請求在影片放映前加之抽煙有害康健和大眾場所不許可抽煙的通告,並構造了一個大眾辦事運動否決抽煙。

  片子制片方華誼影業的一名高等司理在周六告知消息網站央廣網,該片子並無在勉勵人們抽煙,他們只是在用藝術的方法再現住民的真實生存。

  該司理表現,禁煙令在片子設定的時期裏尚未頒布,而對付誰人時期確當地人來講,抽煙是異常廣泛的。

  因為中國沒有片子分級政策來贊助制片方選取他們不該在片子裏包括的內容,以是控煙協會的請求是可以懂得的。這位司理隨後彌補道,片子行業應當實行相幹禁煙條例。

  北京片子家協會編劇分會秘書長陳秋平告知《全球時報》,“控煙協會的抗議是可以懂得的,而且有很龐大的意義。然則協會過量的幹預,會給文化立異的繁華帶來反感化。”

  【參考譯文】

  A producer of the popular film Mr Six, or Lao Pao'er, on Saturday responded to the Beijing Tobacco Control Association's accusations that the film contains an excessive number of smoking scenes by claiming that the film simply aims to realistically reflect the life of local residents during the period in which it is set.

  In an open letter sent to the Global Times on Thursday, the association strongly criticized the film for containing an excess of shots showing smoking, which the association claimed ignores the regulations making all indoor public spaces, workplaces and public transport vehicles in Beijing smoke-free.

  "The 138-minute film is full of scenes depicting the lighting and passing of cigarettes and smoking ... It seems that everyone in the film can smoke, which goes against reality and is unnecessary. They smoke unscrupulously and illegally in public places," read the letter.

  The association demanded that the film's producer apologize to Beijing residents, add a notice saying smoking is harmful to one's health and smoking is banned in public places before playing the film, and organize a public service activity advocating against tobacco use.

  A senior associate of production studio H. Brothers told news site cnr.cn on Saturday that the film did not encourage people to smoke, but aimed to artistically recreate residents' real life.

  The anti-tobacco ban had not yet been released in the era in which the film is set, and smoking was very common for local residents during that time, said the employee.

  As China has no film classification system to help filmmakers understand what kind of content they can include in their works, the association's appeal is understandable, the employee said, adding that certain tobacco-related restrictions should be imposed on the film industry.

  "The association's protest is understandable, and great importance should be attached to it. However, excessive interference by the association would have an adverse effect on the prosperity of cultural creation," Chen Qiuping, head of the scriptwriter branch of the Beijing Film Association, told the Global Times.