研究顯示:你學的專業透露你的性格!

2016/02/05 瀏覽次數:3 收藏
分享到:

  你在大學進修的是甚麽專業?

  假如是和司法大概金融相幹的專業,你也許不太想持續看下去。

  由於最新研討表現,專業與咱們的本性之間具備必定的接洽。進修司法大概金融的你大概有自私分歧作的偏向,並且難有感同身受的領會。

  但從踴躍的一方面說,你又多是交際場所的活潑份子。

  研討職員對來自12個分歧專業的13000多名大門生舉行了研討剖析。

  通過火析他們發明,大五類品德特點(註:嚴謹性、外向性、開放性、宜人道與神經質品德特質)與門生所學的專業之間存在必定接洽。

  舉例來講,研討發明,進修司法、經濟、政治學和醫學的門生要比進修其他學科的學素性格加倍外向。

  但從樂於助人和寬容和睦的宜人道特質方面來看,進修司法、商務和經濟的門生的表示不盡人意。

  藝術學與人文學的門生,同那些進修生理學和政治學的門生同樣,在開放性方面得分較高。這象征著他們好奇心強、想象豐碩,而且擅長表達自我情緒。

  比擬之下,進修經濟、工程、司法和科學的門生在開放性上得分較低。

  但是,藝術學與人文學的門生嚴謹性低,神經質特征顯著,這特別體如今他們的焦炙不安與喜怒無常上。

  生理學門生在這些特質上和他們差未幾。

  此項研討的作者安娜·韋德爾來自丹麥奧爾胡斯大學,她表現對此次的研討發明覺得受驚。

  她表現:“經由過程效應量的盤算咱們發明,分歧專業的特質差別是十明白顯的。”

  “風趣的是,這些分歧也證明了咱們對分歧專業那些或多或少的成見,好比精力龐雜的生理學家、緘默寡言的天然科學家和財迷心竅的經濟學家。”

  但同時她也以為此次的研討發明可以贊助那些對專業拿不定主張的門生做出選取,也能夠贊助先生公道支配本身的課程。

  “我並非說這個研討成果對付指點和選取有何等主要,但它對付有專業選取艱苦癥,大概不想只依據才能來選取專業的門生來講,確切有著啟示的感化。”韋德爾博士表現。

  “先生也能夠有更好的機遇來懂得門生並因材施教。”

  【參考譯文】

  What did you study at university?

  If it was something along the lines of law or business, you might want to look away now.

  That's because according to new research, which has found a link between our university subjects and our personalities, you have selfish, uncooperative tendencies and are not very in touch with your feelings.

  On the plus side, you're probably the life and soul of a party, the findings suggest.

  Researchers analysed data from more than 13,000 university students who were involved in 12 separate studies.

  From this, they discovered a correlation between the 'Big Five' major personality traits and the subjects they were enrolled on.

  For example, those studying law, economics, political science and medicine tended to be much more extroverted than those taking other subjects, the study found.

  But when it came to 'agreeableness' - the tendency towards being helpful, generous and considerate - the lawyers scored particularly low, as did business and economics students.

  Arts and humanities students, as well as those studying psychology and politics scored highly for openness, meaning they were curious, imaginative and in touch with their inner feelings.

  While economists, engineers, lawyers and scientists scored comparatively low.

  However, the arts and humanities students also tended to be less conscientiousness and more neurotic, typically exhibiting signs of anxiety and moodiness.

  Psychology students were not far behind arts and humanities students for these traits.

  Study author Anna Vedel, from the University of Aarhus in Denmark, said she was surprised by the magnitude of the results.

  'The effect sizes show that the differences found are not trivial, far from,' she said.

  'On the more humorous side they do confirm our more or less prejudicial stereotypes of the disturbed psychologist, the withdrawn natural scientist, the cynical economist.'

  And she said that the findings could help those school pupils who currently have no idea what to study at university, as well as helping academics to plan their lectures.

  'I'm not arguing that these results should play a major role in either guidance or selection, but it might provide some inspiration for students that are in doubt about study choices and want to make a choice based on more than abilities, for example,' said Dr Vedel.

  'Or teachers might better understand their student population and may be able to tailor their structure to it.'