ACT閱讀題型之對比題

　　本日小編將為眾人具體先容一下比較題這類題型，以便贊助眾人控制更多的答題辦法和技能，下面一路來看一下吧。

　　一、標題特色

　　比較題是指對文章中湧現的人物大概對文章中提到的分歧概念舉行的比擬。在小說範例的文章中，多是關於人物之間性情特色大概與人物相幹的事宜的比較;在非小說範例的文章中，比較標題多是關於文章中觸及到的分歧概念之間的比擬。

　　二、答題要點

　　做這種題的時刻留意與標題相幹的原文中觸及到的表現遷移轉變大概表現分歧概念的詞語，比方：but, different, however, in contrast, nevertheless, whereas, while, on the other hand, some...others, different等。

　　三、發問方法

　　The distinction between …and ...is that:

　　四、真題剖析

　　在為眾人先容完理論常識以後，小編聯合積年真題為眾人講授一道這類範例題，以便贊助眾人更好的接收，下面一路來演習一下吧。

　　Three decades later, Swedish chemist and Nobel laureate Svante Arrhenius agreed, but he took issue with part of Kelvin’s scenario. The fiery trauma of a meteoroid ejected from a planet or out of the solar system, he argued, would incinerate any cells it harbored. Instead of hitching rides within rocks, Arrhenius said, life could travel unaided. In 1903, he proposed that spores of plants and germs might drift through space propelled by the gentle pressure of starlight. He called this idea panspermia ( from the Greek for“seeds everywhere”).

　　Based on lines 35-40, the distinction between Kelvin’s scenario and Arrhenius’s argument is that:

　　A.instead of hitching rides within rocks, Arrhenius said life could travel unaided.

　　B.our ancestor cells must have been created within our own planetary system or in a nearby sister system bom at the same time.

　　C.life vagabonds through the cosmos.

　　D.if at the present instant no life existed upon this earth, one such stone falling upon it might lead to its becoming covered with vegetation.

　　剖析：這道題對Kelvin和Arrhenius的概念舉行了比擬。與Kelvin的“性命是憑仗必定的序言來流傳”的概念分歧的是，Arrhenius以為“性命可以自行流傳，不須要幫助”。對應原文中的謎底是“Instead of hitching rides within rocks, Arrhenius said, life could travel unaided.”

　　以上便是本日小編為眾人分享的ACT瀏覽題型之比較題的全體內容，願望對您有所贊助，若想懂得更多出國留學的信息請登錄留學。籌劃加入ACT測驗培訓、雅思培訓的考生，請點擊在線咨詢，留學的先生會第臨時間和你接洽。末了，小編祝您測驗順遂。