ACT寫作滿分範文標準調整

　　ACT官網自2015年10月將“增強版寫作”本來 “Intelligent Machines”題目標獨一的一篇滿分範文調換掉了，小編在此與眾人分享本次ACT範文改換的緣故原由和變更後的範文特色。

　　變更緣故原由：

　　1. 9月12日ACT寫作改造後首考，ACT官方依據大批的考生寫作樣原來調劑官方滿分範文，經由過程分歧立論角度、概念剖析、說話作風的新範文來調劑對評分尺度的解讀。

　　2. 與SAT寫作改造早期，CB在官網和可汗連續放出5篇作文題和多少分數段的範文來比，ACT官網今朝只有““Intelligent Machines”1個標題和6篇分歧分數段範文(僅1篇滿分範文)，所給參考樣本太少。變更後，咱們手頭有2篇分歧角度和作風的範文。

　　變更後的範文特色：

　　1. 概念剖析牢牢環繞標題給出的3個perspectives睜開，舉行剖析、舉例。

　　2. 沒有在文中明白指出本身所陳說的是第幾個概念。在舊滿分範文中”This is in agreement with Perspective One”的表述引誘性比擬強，會引發考生對這類表述需要性的迷惑，新滿分範文中這類明白表述不存在了。

　　3. 寫作作風更像托福、和本來的ACT寫作，辯證思惟、說話流暢度都沒有本來的範文尺度那末高。

　　官方範文示例：

　　Sample Essay 6

　　Ideas and Analysis: Score = 6

　　Development and Support: Score = 6

　　Organization: Score = 6

　　Language Use and Conventions: Score = 6

　　Advances in technology have become so widely accepted in today’s culture that very few people are willing to pause to consider the consequences. People get so excited about what new technologies can offer that they forget to question whether there might be any negative effects. Without caution and deliberation, replacing the natural with the mechanical would undoubtedly be disasterous.

　　The economic implications of the potential mechanical takeover alone should be enough to dissuade anyone from moving too fast. In the event the robots are more widely used in the workplace, humans would surely be replaced. At first, businesses would benefit from the efficiency of robots, but eventually a depressed job market would lead to a population that struggles just to feed themselves and their families, let alone purchase the products these robots make. In the long run, society will suffer if it does not take care to prevent the economic consequences of giving everything over to machines.

　　Our careless use of automation has already taken a toll on our culture. People have been interacting with automation in nearly every aspect of their lives, whether it be shopping, banking, or the use of a telephone. The effect of this is obvious: basic respect for our fellow man is all but absent today because of increased interaction with automation. Why treat a machine with kindness? It suffers no emotional or psychological damage. In a culture saturated with automation, we get used to treating machines rudely, and we begin to treat each other rudely. This of course leads to all sorts of issues, like intolerence and incivility, and in the long run, results in the complete degradation of culture.

　　Even in the face of these obstacles, some people argue that the increasing intelligence of today’s machines is a good thing. After all, machine power can decrease the human work load. Computer processers double in power and ability every year. Computers are projected to reach human intelligence by as soon as 2025. The implications of this shift are unknown, but one thing is for certain. We are moving into this change too fast to anticipate and prevent damage to the human species. We are approaching this change too quickly for any sort of safety net to be built. Because of this, it is important that we as a species slow down our technological development so that we might consider all the implications of a change this big. We must figure out how to handle negative societal and cultural consequences before we embrace total integration of automated, intelligent machines.

　　Decreasing the speed with which we incorporate mechanical influence is important because of the potential dangers that lurk in blind acceptance. Not only does the preference of the mechanical over the natural interfere with the job market and the economy, but its use also has the potential to seriously degrade our culture as a whole. In combination with the uncertainty surrounding the increasing intelligence of machines, it is most assuredly better for the human species that technological progress be slowed so that we can, if necessary, prevent additional damage.

　　【Scoring Explanation】

　　Ideas and Analysis = 6

　　By framing the issue as a matter of reckless technological abandon, the writer establishes an insightful context for analysis of the issue and its perspectives. This context informs a nuanced, precise thesis: Though we are inclined to welcome technological advancement with open arms, “the potential dangers that lurk in blind acceptance” necessitate “caution and deliberation” as we determine how to make use of intelligent machines. In advancing this thesis, the writer examines the economic and cultural implications of moving too quickly into the age of automation. In doing so, the writer has generated an argument that critically engages with multiple perspectives on this issue.

　　Development and Support = 6

　　An integrated line of reasoning and illustration effectively conveys the argument’s significance by exploring the economic and cultural implications of the mindless incorporation of intelligent machines. Hypothetical examples (In the event the robots are more widely used in the workplace) and skillful reasoning (The implications of this shift are unknown, but one thing is for certain. We are moving into this change too fast to anticipate and prevent damage to the human species) develop and support the thesis by drawing out and making persuasive its meaning and importance. The final body paragraph complicates the argument by conceding both the benefits of machine power and the unprecedented sophistication of modern technologies, using these concessions to reinforce the call for moderation and deliberation—as we reach new technological heights, it is even more important that we “figure out how to handle” potential unintended consequences.

　　Organization = 6

　　As with its development and support, a persistent focus on exploring the thesis benefits the organization of this response. This skillful strategy is driven by its controlling idea, which shapes the argument as it progresses logically from a discussion of future economic implications to a treatment of present-day cultural conditions to an examination of opposing viewpoints. Effective transitions between paragraphs reflect this organizing principle (The economic implications of the potential mechanical takeover; Our careless use of automation has already taken a toll on our culture; Even in the face of these obstacles, some people argue that the increasing intelligence of today’s machines is a good thing), while transitions within paragraphs serve to clarify and strengthen the writer’s reasoning (At first, but eventually, This of course, After all). All told, this strategy increases the effectiveness of the argument.

　　Language Use = 6

　　Precise vocabulary (societal and cultural consequences, intolerence and incivility, emotional or psychological damage) and a variety of clear sentence structures reflect advanced skill in the use of language. So too does the prose itself, which is largely free of errors. Of particular note are the writer’s strategic stylistic choices. Words like degrade, depressed, and damagework to establish a sense of alarm or dread, which underscores the writer’s call for consideration of the potential consequences she perceives. In the final body paragraph, the writer uses repetitive sentence constructions (We are, We are, We must) as the argument moves into its call for action. These rhetorical flourishes work to clarify the thesis and make persuasive its implications, thus enhancing the argument.

　　以上便是本日小編為眾人分享的ACT寫作滿分範文尺度調劑的全體內容，願望對您有所贊助，若想懂得更多有關act測驗時光表、act測驗流程、act測驗用度、act報考指南、act真題及act謎底等信息請登錄留學。籌劃加入ACT測驗培訓、雅思培訓的考生，請點擊在線咨詢，留學的先生會第臨時間和你接洽。末了，小編祝您測驗順遂。