針對分歧的act瀏覽標題，考生須要采用分歧的解答技能，這對考生準確答題來講是很主要的，本日留學ACT測驗頻道就為考生簡略先容下ACT瀏覽測驗分歧題目標辦理方法，願望能助考生落井下石!
1. 直接究竟題
此類標題通常為就文中所供給的信息舉行直接發問，須要考生找到準確的對應處，並作同義轉換。
原文： “The revisionist interpretation, which I support, does not enshrine dinosaurs as paragons of intellect, but it does maintain that they were not small brained after all. They had the “right-sized” brains for reptiles of their body size.”
譯文：我所支撐的修改主義者的說明，便是不把恐龍視為智力的榜樣，然則也主意他們究竟不是小腦。對他們這類體態的爬蟲類來講，他們的腦的巨細恰好適合。
標題：According to the passage, what is the revisionist interpretation concerning the relationship between intelligence and physical size
A. Dinosaurs actually had relatively large brains.
B. Dinosaurs were paragons of intellect.
C. Dinosaurs were relatively small brained.
D. Dinosaurs’ brains were appropriately sized.
謎底：D
剖析：直接究竟題依據文章內容，做直接的同義轉換，此處將right-sized改寫為appropriately sized，屬於準確改寫。而A選項將其改寫為relatively large，不準確。
留意：直接究竟題常見毛病選項的特色為有意喪失not，如B選項中的paragons of intellect與文章雷同，然則喪失了not，是以具備必定困惑性。一樣，C選項中的small brained也與文章完整雷同，但也有意喪失了not。
2. 舉例感化題
此類標題就文中的例子舉行發問，須要考生答復此例子在文中所起的感化。
原文： “Government is so technical that even career civil servants cannot explain what is happening. In 1978 I attended a seminar on federal estate and gift tax, where the Internal Revenue Service lawyers responsible for this area frankly confessed that they did not understand the Tax Reform Act of 1976.”
譯文：當局是如斯的有技巧含量以致於乃至連公事員都不克不及說明正在產生著甚麽。1978年，我出席了一個聯邦資產稅收的研究會，在這裏賣力的美國海內稅局的狀師坦率地認可到，他們不明確1976年的稅收改造法案。
標題：The author uses the description of the tax seminar in 1978 to make the point that some governmental issues are:
A. so technical that not even career civil servants can understand them.
B. so technical that only career civil servants can understand them.
C. more technical than they used to be before the passage of the Tax Reform Act.
D. too technical for anyone other than an Internal Revenue Service tax lawyer to understand.
謎底：A
剖析：作者在文中描寫一個例子的感化便是為了證實一個結論，以是，舉例感化題的謎底為例子以前或以後的結論句。一樣平常，由for example開首的例子，結論句在以前。假如例子停止後湧現therefore，則therefore以後為結論句。本題結論句在例子以前，即Government is so technical that even career civil servants cannot explain what is happening. 經由過程同義改寫，獲得A選項。B選項毛病緣故原由仍然是有意喪失not。
留意：舉例感化題常見毛病選項為選項中重現例證華夏文，比如斯題的C, D選項中湧現的Tax Reform Act和Internal Revenue Service。
3. 推論題
此類標題與直接究竟題分歧，不是就文中的信息舉行直接的發問，而是考核作者所寫的某處內容現實表示了甚麽。
原文：“The remarkable thing about dinosaurs is not that they became extinct, but that they dominated the earth for so long…”
“People, on this criterion, are scarcely worth mentioning—5 million years perhaps since Australopithecus, a mere 50, 000 for our own species, Homo sapiens…”
譯文：恐龍最知名的一件工作不是他們滅盡了，而是他們占領了地球如斯之長的時光
人類，在這類尺度下，基本不值得一提——也許5百萬年前的南邊古猿，僅僅5萬年前的咱們本身的物種，智人。
標題：In the context of the passage, what does the author mean when he states that “people … are scarcely worth mentioning” (lines 81-82)?
A. Compared to the complex social behavior of dinosaurs, human behavior seems simple.
B. Compared to the longevity of dinosaurs, humans have been on earth a very short time.
C. Compared to the size of dinosaurs, human seem incredibly small.
D. Compared to the amount of study done on dinosaurs, study of human behavior is severely lacking
謎底：B
剖析：解答推論題時辦法以下：
1. 假如定位句處於段首，或定位句後有冒號，破折號時，今後找謎底。
2. 假如定位句中有this等代詞時，則往前找謎底。
3. 假如定位句既處於段首，句中又有代詞，則同時讀句前和句後，並作比擬，得出謎底。
此題屬於第三種情形，讀上文，知“恐龍占領地球的時光如斯之長”;讀下文，得“人類，在這類尺度下，不值得一提”。二者比擬，人類在地球上的生計時光比恐龍短，以是準確謎底選B。
留意：靈巧運用“豎讀選項法”，此題當選項開首雷同，可經由過程豎讀選項，快速獲得各選項的癥結詞，以便利解題。
以上內容為考生先容了ACT瀏覽測驗分歧題目標辦理方法，願望對考生準確答題有贊助，更多ACT測驗出色內容盡在留學ACT測驗頻道，敬請考生連續存眷。預祝考生在接下來ACT測驗中有精彩的施展。
市場價：HK$ 92
