托福閱讀句子簡化題解答方法

2015/09/06 瀏覽次數:2 收藏
分享到:

  托福瀏覽句子簡化題是托福瀏覽測驗中常常湧現的一種,並且句子簡化的托福瀏覽試題可分為兩種範例,響應的解答這類托福瀏覽題的辦法也是分歧的,考生假如不會準確的辦法大概會延誤很多時光,下面就為考生做一下先容,供考生參考。

  第一種是有邏輯幹系的句子。那就須要分辯是哪種邏輯幹系,常見的邏輯幹系有三種:遷移轉變、因果和比擬;第二步就 是要肯定邏輯幹系的兩邊:如果是因果幹系就須要肯定緣故原由和成果分離是甚麽。毛病選項每每會因果顛倒;如果是遷移轉變幹系就須要肯定作者更誇大哪一部門信息。毛病選項每每把次要信息放在重要的地位上(如but背面);假如是比擬幹系的話,就須要肯定比擬的兩邊,比擬的內容和比擬的成果。毛病選項每每把比擬成果弄 反。

  有些托福瀏覽題型句子邏輯和謎底邏輯是相對於應的,優先用邏輯解題比擬簡略,可以敏捷準確解題,如例1。

  Example 1 TPO5-2 The Origin of the Pacific Island People

  Contrary to the arguments of some that much of the pacific was settled by Polynesians accidentally marooned after being lost and adrift, it seems reasonable that this feat was accomplished by deliberate colonization expeditions that set out fully stocked with food and domesticated plants and animals.

  9. Which of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in the passage? Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or leave out essential information.

  Some people have argued that the Pacific was settled by traders who became lost while transporting domesticated plants and animals.

  The original Polynesian settlers were probably marooned on the islands, but they may have been joined later by carefully prepared colonization expeditions.

  Although it seems reasonable to believe that colonization expeditions would set out fully stocked, this is contradicted by much of the evidence.

  The settlement of the Pacific islands was probably intentional and well planned rather than accidental as some people have proposed.

  先看原句,contrary to表現一個與骨幹部門相反的附加信息,骨幹部門在逗號以後,後半句說看起來公道的是這個豪舉是由經心預備的殖民遠征實現的,他們滿載食品和動植物。原句 中湧現了一個表現相反的邏輯幹系。選項中只有C和D含有遷移轉變幹系。C說只管看起來帶著充分的食品殖民遠征是公道的,然則這被許多證據辯駁。原句中並無體 現用證據來辯駁,以是C不準確。選項D中的intentional and well planed對應原句的deliberate,rather than 對應原句開首的contrary to,原文便是否認了不測,支撐了經心預備,以是D準確。

  然則偶然會發明光靠邏輯去解題,偶然不會簡略乃至會毛病,由於偶然邏輯對了但語義紕謬,但有些邏輯產生了轉變然則倒是準確選項,如例2所示。

  Example 2 TPO3-3 The Long-Term Stability of Ecosystems

  Many ecologists now think that the relative long-term stability of climax communities comes not from diversity but from the “patchiness” of the environment, an environment that varies from place to place supports more kinds of organisms than an environment that is uniform.

  11.Which of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in the passage? Incurred choices change the meaning in important ways or leave out essential information.

  Ecologists now think that the stability of an environment is a result of diversity rather than patchiness.

  Patchy environments that vary from place to place do not often have high species diversity.

  Uniform environments cannot be climax communities because they do not support as many types of organisms as patchy environments.

  A patchy environment is thought to increase stability because it is able to support a wide variety of organisms.

  先看句子,有not…but…表遷移轉變,假如先經由過程邏輯去做題,那就直接把準確的D選項直接排撤除了,A,B,C都有rather than,not,not等,明顯這個辦法是不可的,以是還得靠骨幹來做題。

  句子中央逗號離隔,逗號以前是environment,以後是對environment的說明,以是這個句子的重點在前半句,說很多的生態學家如今認 為 C群落的歷久穩固性不是起源於多樣性,而是起源於P情況。是以這句話的焦點便是P對穩固性的決議感化。只有D與原句符合,說P情況可以被以為增長穩固性, 由於它可以支撐普遍的各式各樣的有機體,because背面的緣故原由與原句後半句對應。

  選項A說: 生態學家如今以為穩固性起源於多樣性而不是P。與原文相反。

  選項B說: P沒有多樣性。紕謬,原文P情況能支撐更多的物種,且它沒有說P和穩固性的幹系,也紕謬;

  選項C說: 同一的情況不多是C群落,由於它們不克不及像P同樣支撐很多種類的有機體,主語Uniform environments出如今原句後半句,不是句子焦點,以是必定紕謬。

  第二種範例是沒有邏輯幹系的句子,那就須要肯定句子的骨幹身分。肯定句子的主謂賓,潤飾部門先不看,依據骨幹成 分去肯定選項(準確選項每每是原文的自動變被動、語序倒置或同義調換)。如果有跨越一個選項相符句子的骨幹身分,再去看句子的潤飾身分信息是不是同等。毛病 選項每每是把原文次要信息看成重要信息來說;或描寫毛病信息、無中生有信息等。

  Example 3 TPO4-1 Deer Populations of the Puget Sound

  11.Which of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in the passage? Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or leave out essential information.

  In addition to finding increase of suitable browse, like huckleberry and vine maple, Arthur Einarsen, longtime game biologist in the Pacific Northwest, found quality of browse in the open areas to be substantially more nutritive.

  Arthur Einarsen’s longtime family with the Pacific Northwest ?helped ?him discover areas where deer had an increase in suitable browse.

  Arthur Einarsen found that deforested feeding grounds provided deer with more and better food(browse).

  Biologist like Einarsen believe it is important ?to find additional open areas with suitable browse for deer to inhabit.

  According to Einarsen, huckleberry and vine maple are examples of vegetation that may someday improve the nutrition of deer ?in the open areas of the Pacific Northwest.

  句子無顯著邏輯,捉住幹,句子有許多逗號,咱們要先找到句子主語。開首in addition to是附加信息不會是主語,背面like舉例子也不會是主語,再背面AE是一小我名,多是主語,背面緊接著說生物學家,是AE的同位語,末了一個小分 句, found是個動詞,是句子謂語,這句話的焦點是說AE發明曠地上的草更有養分。到選項傍邊,只有B說 Arthur Einarsen 發明無樹的尋食所在能給鹿供給更多更好的食品,這裏的better對應原句more nutritive,deforested feeding grounds對應the open areas,由於the 註解前文中有提到,而前一句確切就說了deforested,是以完整對應,本題選B。

  選項A說: AE與西北寧靖洋的親密幹系贊助他發明有更多適合草料的地域。西北寧靖洋在原句中不是重點,在A裏倒是主語中的內容,以是A不克不及選。

  選項C說:像Arthur Einarsen如許的生物學家以為,為鹿探求分外的坦蕩並具有適合嫩草的棲身區是很主要的。主語紕謬,且原句中沒誇大主要性,C錯。

  選項D說:依據Einarsen,越橘和藤槭是典範植被,某日大概可以改良寧靖洋西北寬敞地域鹿的養分。D的主語huckleberry and vine maple只是原句中like分句中的例子,不是句子重點,以是D錯。

  綜上所述,句子簡化題,先看句子,有邏輯優先依據邏輯來看,然則不必定邏輯準確便是準確選項,還得聯合內容;無邏輯直接找骨幹,帶著骨幹信息,然後去選項中找謎底。