GMAT邏輯錯誤解析:評價題隱含條件

2016/06/17 瀏覽次數:3 收藏
分享到:

  GMAT邏輯推理對許多同窗來講都是一浩劫點,只有控制好GMAT邏輯技能能力自在應答GMAT邏輯題庫。

  下面GMAT頻道為眾人整頓了GMAT邏輯推理毛病剖析:評價篇,評價題作為GMAT邏輯推理的題型之一,其考核的偏向同假如題相似,重要針對段落推理中的隱含假如(前提),平日評價題的考題思惟分為兩種:Yes和No, 假如謎底為Yes,那末咱們就能夠說,這個Yes答復是對段落推理進程的一種支撐。假如謎底為No, 則情形恰好相反。許多情況下,評價題只是請求考生針對推理建立的隱含前提(假如)來剖斷一個最優選項,是以做題的癥結要看考生可否在段落推理中找到這個邏輯(隱含)假如。下面就讓咱們來看一個實例剖析:

  The United States is not usually thought of as a nation of parakeet lovers. Yet in a census of parakeet owners in selected comparable countries, the United States ranked second, with eleven parakeet owners per hundred people. The conclusion can be drawn from this that people in the United States are more likely to own parakeets than are people in most other countries.

  Knowledge of which of the following would be most useful in judging the accuracy of the conclusion?

  (A) The number of parakeets in the United States.

  (B) The number of parakeet owners in the United States

  (C) The number of parakeet owners per hundred people in the country that ranked first in the census

  (D) The number of parakeet owners in the United States compared to the numbers of owners of other pet birds in the United States

  (E) The number of parakeet owners per hundred people in the countries not included in the census.

  明白題意今後,咱們起首須要明白那邊是本題的結論與條件,本題結論的條件為“美國每百人中具有長尾鸚鵡的人數在舉行比擬的國度中位於第二位,結論為:比擬較而言,美國人加倍愛好豢養長尾鸚鵡。在由條件向結論的推理過程當中,考生每每會疏忽一點,即結論中的most other countries除包含“selected comparable countries”還應包含那些沒有舉行比擬的國度,是以咱們在斷定結論是不是準確曩昔,還必需曉得那些沒有介入過此查詢拜訪的國度的狀態是如何的。以是E為準確選項。

  總結本題,咱們可以發明門生每每因為沒有精確懂得題意,致使了推理偏向湧現誤差,在推理揣摸的過程當中,不單單請求考生只是簡略的讀懂文章罷了,更主要的是應能橫向與縱向對邏輯題所隱含的題目舉行剖析性思惟,也只有經由過程賡續演習,發明題目並辦理題目,咱們能力找合適本身的解題思緒。

  ​網GMAT頻道佳構推舉:

  在線直播小班課程 足不出戶學英語!

  gmat公然課 百種免費課程會聚一堂

  1對1事業課程 出國測驗私家訂制

  名師培優課 2016申請訂制課程

  掃描二維碼,一手控制最新資訊!